Pelosi’s outline of the bailout bill
Verbatim outline, with comments
09.28.08 B
Hello and welcome to Demand Side Economics
I am Alan Harvey and This is a Demand Side special presentation for Sunday, September 28, 2008.
Here is the verbatim outline of the agreement on the Paulson Plan bailout as issued From Office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi — Sept. 28, 2008
As discussed in an earlier post today, the Democrats have a strong negotiating position because they benefit most if nothing gets done — politically, at least. Only Democrats will survive a financial system collapse should this bill not get through.
Here is the outline of the agreement.
REINVEST, REIMBURSE, REFORM
IMPROVING THE FINANCIAL RESCUE LEGISLATION
Significant bipartisan work has built consensus around dramatic improvements to the original Bush-Paulson plan to stabilize American financial markets — including cutting in half the Administration’s initial request for $700 billion and requiring Congressional review for any future commitment of taxpayers’ funds. If the government loses money, the financial industry will pay back the taxpayers.
3 Phases of a Financial Rescue with Strong Taxpayer Protections
Reimburse the taxpayer … through ownership of shares and appreciation in the value of purchased assets
Reform business-as-usual on Wall Street … strong Congressional oversight and no golden parachutes
CRITICAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESCUE PLAN
Democrats have insisted from day one on substantial changes to make the Bush-Paulson plan acceptable — protecting American taxpayers and Main Street — and these elements will be included in the legislation
Protection for taxpayers, ensuring THEY share IN ANY profits
Cuts the payment of $700 billion in half and conditions future payments on Congressional review
Gives taxpayers an ownership stake and profit-making opportunities with participating companies
Puts taxpayers first in line to recover assets if participating company fails
Guarantees taxpayers are repaid in full — if other protections have not actually produced a profit
Allows the government to purchase troubled assets from pension plans, local governments, and small banks that serve low- and middle-income families
Limits on excessive compensation for CEOs and executives
New restrictions on CEO and executive compensation for participating companies:
No multi-million dollar golden parachutes
Limits CEO compensation that encourages unnecessary risk-taking
Recovers bonuses paid based on promised gains that later turn out to be false or inaccurate
Strong independent oversight and transparency
Four separate independent oversight entities or processes to protect the taxpayer
A strong oversight board appointed by bipartisan leaders of Congress
A GAO presence at Treasury to oversee the program and conduct audits to ensure strong internal controls, and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse
An independent Inspector General to monitor the Treasury Secretary’s decisions
Transparency — requiring posting of transactions online — to help jumpstart private sector demand
Meaningful judicial review of the Treasury Secretary’s actions
Help to prevent home foreclosures crippling the American economy
The government can use its power as the owner of mortgages and mortgage backed securities to facilitate loan modifications (such as, reduced principal or interest rate, lengthened time to pay back the mortgage) to help reduce the 2 million projected foreclosures in the next year
Extends provision (passed earlier in this Congress) to stop tax liability on mortgage foreclosures
Helps save small businesses that need credit by aiding small community banks hurt by the mortgage crisis—allowing these banks to deduct losses from investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stocks
The outline ends without mention of the Republicans strange and still poorly described scheme of somehow insuring bad paper after it has turned bad, cutting the tax on capital gains, and further deregulating.
Now comes the vote in Congress.
Best for all these politicians if a broad majority of both parties joins in on the Aye side. Bush, Paulson and Bernanke stand ready as lame ducks to accept blame for failure. But better for individual Congressmen to break ranks and stand up to Wall Street on behalf of their angry constituents.
I see this as a purely political exercise. Be aware, my political analysis is far more suspect than my economic analysis. Economically, this may work for awhile and it may not. It depends on the internal conditions of a banking system that is opaque. This plan is certainly not a comprehensive answer to the systemic problem. We’ll quote from Nouriel Roubini tomorrow. A comprehensive answer must include cracking open these institutions, exposing them to the sunlight and then reconstructing them into their Glass-Steagall form. This is very far from what Bernanke and Paulson, negotiating on behalf of the financial sector, are trying to do here. They are continuing their strategy of muddle through on the supply side.
Much more hopeful is the opportunity to deconstruct the toxic paper and get down to the individual mortgage level where rational workouts and writedowns can begin, one at a time, to find the bottom to the price.
Politically, however, it is clear that House Republicans and John McCain are in a position to take a fall if the measure fails to pass and the financial system melts down as a result. It certainly turned out badly for McCain’s grandstanding when instead of agreement, the White House meeting produced breakdown by Republican rebels. Democrats are in the position of looking like adults in the case of success and not worrying too much for their political fates if it doesn’t pass.
Notice the House Republicans insurance scheme didn’t make it into this outline.
We’ll go back to economics tomorrow.
This is Alan Harvey, from the Demand Side.

Standard Podcasts: 








