Jeffrey Frankel on the crisis
Noted Harvard economist speaks prior to the No vote by the House
![]() |
Category : Business | Tags : economics poverty keynes environmental progressive |
Noted Harvard economist speaks prior to the No vote by the House
Plus DS on inflation/deflation and Roubini on the bailout bill process
John Williams, economics, statistics, Roubini, inflation,
Verbatim outline, with comments
09.28.08 B
Hello and welcome to Demand Side Economics
I am Alan Harvey and This is a Demand Side special presentation for Sunday, September 28, 2008.
Here is the verbatim outline of the agreement on the Paulson Plan bailout as issued From Office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi — Sept. 28, 2008
As discussed in an earlier post today, the Democrats have a strong negotiating position because they benefit most if nothing gets done — politically, at least. Only Democrats will survive a financial system collapse should this bill not get through.
Here is the outline of the agreement.
REINVEST, REIMBURSE, REFORM
IMPROVING THE FINANCIAL RESCUE LEGISLATION
Significant bipartisan work has built consensus around dramatic improvements to the original Bush-Paulson plan to stabilize American financial markets — including cutting in half the Administration’s initial request for $700 billion and requiring Congressional review for any future commitment of taxpayers’ funds. If the government loses money, the financial industry will pay back the taxpayers.
3 Phases of a Financial Rescue with Strong Taxpayer Protections
Reimburse the taxpayer … through ownership of shares and appreciation in the value of purchased assets
Reform business-as-usual on Wall Street … strong Congressional oversight and no golden parachutes
CRITICAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESCUE PLAN
Democrats have insisted from day one on substantial changes to make the Bush-Paulson plan acceptable — protecting American taxpayers and Main Street — and these elements will be included in the legislation
Protection for taxpayers, ensuring THEY share IN ANY profits
Cuts the payment of $700 billion in half and conditions future payments on Congressional review
Gives taxpayers an ownership stake and profit-making opportunities with participating companies
Puts taxpayers first in line to recover assets if participating company fails
Guarantees taxpayers are repaid in full — if other protections have not actually produced a profit
Allows the government to purchase troubled assets from pension plans, local governments, and small banks that serve low- and middle-income families
Limits on excessive compensation for CEOs and executives
New restrictions on CEO and executive compensation for participating companies:
No multi-million dollar golden parachutes
Limits CEO compensation that encourages unnecessary risk-taking
Recovers bonuses paid based on promised gains that later turn out to be false or inaccurate
Strong independent oversight and transparency
Four separate independent oversight entities or processes to protect the taxpayer
A strong oversight board appointed by bipartisan leaders of Congress
A GAO presence at Treasury to oversee the program and conduct audits to ensure strong internal controls, and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse
An independent Inspector General to monitor the Treasury Secretary’s decisions
Transparency — requiring posting of transactions online — to help jumpstart private sector demand
Meaningful judicial review of the Treasury Secretary’s actions
Help to prevent home foreclosures crippling the American economy
The government can use its power as the owner of mortgages and mortgage backed securities to facilitate loan modifications (such as, reduced principal or interest rate, lengthened time to pay back the mortgage) to help reduce the 2 million projected foreclosures in the next year
Extends provision (passed earlier in this Congress) to stop tax liability on mortgage foreclosures
Helps save small businesses that need credit by aiding small community banks hurt by the mortgage crisis—allowing these banks to deduct losses from investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stocks
The outline ends without mention of the Republicans strange and still poorly described scheme of somehow insuring bad paper after it has turned bad, cutting the tax on capital gains, and further deregulating.
Now comes the vote in Congress.
Best for all these politicians if a broad majority of both parties joins in on the Aye side. Bush, Paulson and Bernanke stand ready as lame ducks to accept blame for failure. But better for individual Congressmen to break ranks and stand up to Wall Street on behalf of their angry constituents.
I see this as a purely political exercise. Be aware, my political analysis is far more suspect than my economic analysis. Economically, this may work for awhile and it may not. It depends on the internal conditions of a banking system that is opaque. This plan is certainly not a comprehensive answer to the systemic problem. We’ll quote from Nouriel Roubini tomorrow. A comprehensive answer must include cracking open these institutions, exposing them to the sunlight and then reconstructing them into their Glass-Steagall form. This is very far from what Bernanke and Paulson, negotiating on behalf of the financial sector, are trying to do here. They are continuing their strategy of muddle through on the supply side.
Much more hopeful is the opportunity to deconstruct the toxic paper and get down to the individual mortgage level where rational workouts and writedowns can begin, one at a time, to find the bottom to the price.
Politically, however, it is clear that House Republicans and John McCain are in a position to take a fall if the measure fails to pass and the financial system melts down as a result. It certainly turned out badly for McCain’s grandstanding when instead of agreement, the White House meeting produced breakdown by Republican rebels. Democrats are in the position of looking like adults in the case of success and not worrying too much for their political fates if it doesn’t pass.
Notice the House Republicans insurance scheme didn’t make it into this outline.
We’ll go back to economics tomorrow.
This is Alan Harvey, from the Demand Side.
Plus late news of a negotiated agreement on the Bailout
09.28 Special
Hello and welcome to Demand Side Economics
I am Alan Harvey and this is a Demand Side Special presentation
for Sunday, September 28, 2008
In a moment, the only news out of the negotiating room and it says a lot.
Between the lines, I read
This statement indicates John McCain and the House Republicans are directly in line to take the blame should a bailout bill fail to emerge from the negotiations or fail to pass due to significant defections. And defections are certain, because incumbents facing a surge in voter support for Democrats. And the election is 40 days away.
It also suggests that the Democrats hand was strongly improved by the McCain - House Republican political theater. I hear guarantees that must mean Paulson has acceded to either direct equity or preferred positions on the debt.
Democrats must remember 1993, when the Budget Bill that set in motion the fiscal responsibility of the 1990s was passed and Republicans led by Newt Gingrich ruthlessly pilloried them for raising taxes, using it as the hottest of hot buttons to take the House. “Democrats have the majority. They could pass it if they wanted to,” has been the almost plea from House Republicans. It is not going to happen.
It is in the political interest of Democrats for the plan to fail and an economic collapse to follow. That would literally be the end of the Republican Party. If the plan fails and somehow the financial system gets out of it, cows will fly. If the plan succeeds and doesn’t hold things together for very long, all those who voted for it are going to suffer.
One sure indication of whether the bailout is necessary is whether it passes. If it passes, it means both parties on the eve of a pivotal election have been convinced the plan is the only bridge across a widening crevasse. Republicans have been convinced by interested parties or by their own calculations that the economy may well collapse. Republicans cannot afford economic collapse politically, and Democrats? They can afford it politically. They can afford terms which financial houses will find very distasteful. The worse the economy, the more Democrats come to Washington.
A last thought — Whatever it is, this will not be enough. While this crisis has been going on, the free market has shrunk to three mega-banks, a giant federal presence, a staggering central bank, and some feudal outposts. This is not a stable structure.
Noted investor gives his take on a wide range of issues